Monday, July 11, 2011

King Baldwin the Leper, A Second Look

It was on this day in 1174 that King Amalric I died and was succeeded by one of my very favorite monarchs King Baldwin IV of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem, who I have mentioned before and will doubtless mention again. Rather like St Joan of Arc, it is impossible for me to look at the life of King Baldwin IV and not come to the conclusion that some divine power had to be operating on his behalf. God is the only explanation for how is life was possible. Here is a look back at his life:

The Crusades, while undeniably a just cause (because the Holy Land was originally part of the Roman Empire and the Christians were only taking back what was first taken from them), are often a touchy subject because of the painful fact that many of the Crusaders did not always behave in a manner reflecting the Faith and Church they were fighting for. However, a great example of the true spirit of the Crusaders was King Baldwin IV of Jerusalem. He must stand among the best examples of Christian chivalry in the struggle for the Holy Land. He was a man who understood suffering, who understood the Church and who understood the principles behind the chivalric code of Christianity. He was born in 1161 to King Amalric I of Jerusalem and Queen Agnes of Edessa. When playing as a child it was noticed that he seemed to feel no pain in his limbs, an examination discovered that he had leprosy. A chronicler wrote, "all of his life was nothing more than a struggle against the irreversible evil. And, more yet, much more, it was a testimony to the powers of a man over himself and of the amazing incarnation of his highest obligations".

King Amalric I died on July 11, 1174 and Baldwin IV ascended the throne at the tender age of 13 and so his power was exercised by a regent, Raymond of Tripoli, though Philip of Flanders attempted to seize control in 1176. When he finally became old enough to rule on his own, he ruled well, but age never stopped him from doing his duty. When he was still 13-years-old, in 1174, he attacked Damascus to draw the Muslim Sultan, the fierce Saladin, away from Aleppo. In 1176 he led similar attacks at Damascus and Andujar repelling Muslim attacks, always leading personally from the front, sharing the danger with his men. In 1177 he responded to an attack by Saladin on Ascalon, though he had only 500 men to come to the city's aid. Saladin, thinking Baldwin was trapped and Jerusalem defenseless, split his huge army to take both cities. Saladin was mistaken. King Baldwin summoned the Knights Templar from Gaza and launched a joint attack with them on the forces besieging Ascalon.

The combined force then turned to pursue Saladin, overtaking him near the city of Ramleh. Despite his reinforcements, the Christian knights were still outnumbered, but they put their faith in God and none moreso than King Baldwin IV. The Bishop of Bethlehem was with them, carrying the True Cross, before which the King prostrated himself in prayer. Baldwin lured the Egyptians over a ravine and then turned and charged at the crucial moment when his enemy was most vulnerable. The Christian knights saw a vision of St George in the sky over the battlefield and dealt the Muslims a crushing defeat. Saladin himself would have been captured if his bodyguard had not been sacrificed to buy time for his escape.

The Sultan was not finished yet though and he attacked the Holy Land again in 1181 but was defeated at Belvoir castle by the Jerusalem army near the Sea of Galilee. He then turned toward Beirut but once again King Baldwin was waiting and again defeated Saladin's attack. However, after a period of internal conflict among the Muslims, Saladin was back again in 1183, attacking Kerak Castle. Once again, King Baldwin came to the rescue. Despite being so frail and sick that he had to be carried on a litter, Baldwin again defeated Saladin and forced him to retreat. The Muslim commander was to threaten Jerusalem again, but unfortunately there would be no one like Baldwin IV to defend the city. The leper king died on March 16, 1185, not long after the death of his mother. He had reigned longer than anyone thought and won victories that many would have dismissed as impossible. Baldwin the Leper represented what was best about the crusading spirit and fully deserves to stand alongside the likes of Raymond of Toulouse, Bishop Ademar, Godfrey de Bouillon and Richard the Lion-Heart.

7 comments:

  1. Despite he died young he was an brave crusader-king.

    The crusades where a just cause, but it was almost imposible to the european crusaders to win because in that moment the muslim where superiors in technology, their civilisation was superior and they had more soldiers than the europeans.

    Also is true that where ill-intentioned people in both sides, that made looting and killed civilians, but the worst crime of the midle ages was the forth crusade that destroyed the byzantine empire.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He endured the passion everyday in his entire life. I am surprise that no one has made him a saint.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If he had a cause I would certainly support it. However, if nothing else, I'm sure simply being King of Jerusalem would make him "untouchable" (no pun intended) as that would generate lots of controvery with the Muslim world (maybe even the Israelis) no matter how unfounded. During his reign, all religions were treated fairly and he wanted peace, but he did go to war when necessary and I just don't see someone like that being canonized these days.

    ReplyDelete
  4. What a shame he probably won't be canonized. He certainly is very deserving, and was given a particularly heavy cross to bear.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Argentinian, I question that the muslim's were superior in technology. The crusaders had the edge in technology, but they were vastly outnumbered, and scattered throughout the Holy Land. Saladin was able to unite the Muslims from Egypt to Basra and that's why they eventually won.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Elizabeth, actually Argentinian is right! Muslims were topping the world in technology back then. their Arsenal was enough developed to achieve the win!

    ReplyDelete
  7. In most technologies the Muslim world was superior. However, with exception of siege weapons, the Crusaders did generally have better armament. Military tech was the strong point of European knowledge at the time, and Saladin himself mentioned that "Frankish merchants sell the best weapons, thus ensuring their defeat". Medieval Europe was, as they say, a society built for war. Those ages have simply been demonized by liberalism and socialism as the antithesis of what they stand for.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...