tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8783969302315257415.post4598130235258095298..comments2024-03-16T01:00:19.876-05:00Comments on The Mad Monarchist: Battlefield Royal Profile: Princess Pingyang of ChinaMadMonarchisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08083008336883267870noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8783969302315257415.post-86667431289861415102016-11-23T02:50:02.957-06:002016-11-23T02:50:02.957-06:00Hmm, how should I say this?
It has been proven th...Hmm, how should I say this?<br /><br />It has been proven throughout history that sometimes women might be able to match men's capabilities. Adding to your example Queen Tamar of Georgia who conquered large swaths of territory, Trung sisters and lady Trieu, etc. In modern times there are lots of female monarchs, the Danish, British, and Dutch monarchs comes to mind.<br /><br />But at the same time, it is also well known that women are physically and intellectually inferior to men. Female heroines, monarchs, leaders, are the exception rather than the norm. It could be argued that female can only rose to prominence because the male are too feminized, cucked, and beta. So they rise to fill the vacuum left by men.<br /><br />In the end, I think that women are made for support role and cannot be the number one leader. Example Princess Pingyang, she does it all not for herself, but for her father, husband, and brothers.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00896743040743242505noreply@blogger.com